
Atticus is a law firm and Certified B Corp offering free, high-quality advice to Americans who can't work due to disability. Our experienced disability lawyers bring 50+ combined years of experience and help 100,000+ apply for benefits each year.
Most U.S. workers carry long-term disability insurance. It comes out of every paycheck, it's federally administered, and for a worker earning the national median it costs roughly $49 per month.* They pay for it, yet most don’t realize how to access it when needed and by some estimates, only about half of eligible adults claim benefits. It’s Social Security Disability Insurance, or SSDI.
Atticus surveyed 1,033 working-age adults who, by their own reported work history, are very likely covered by SSDI and who have never received disability benefits. We asked what they knew about the program, what they believed it required, and what they thought it would cost to get help claiming it.
Surprisingly few people are aware that they pay into the program or that it protects them if a serious illness or injury keeps them from working long-term. Roughly half say they'd have no income if illness or injury kept them from working for a year. They're describing a risk that, for most of them, isn't there. The alphabet soup of safety net programs – and the daunting challenge of engaging with the claims process – is confusing for many people, and potentially deters them from claiming insurance that they have paid for over their working careers.
About half of potentially eligible Americans never claim Social Security Disability Insurance.
Nearly half of workers covered by SSDI think they have no disability coverage. 49% said no insurance or benefit would replace their income if illness or injury stopped them from working for a year, yet more than 8 in 10 reported the work history to be SSDI-insured.
Only 15% named a federal program they’d qualify for. More pointed to employer disability coverage (26%) than to the program deducted from their own paychecks.
3 in 5 (61%) don’t know SSDI comes with Medicare. Health coverage is the second-largest thing the program provides and is especially critical for those managing a serious health condition.
7 in 10 don’t know what disability representation costs. Only 30% knew there’s nothing to pay upfront; only 28% knew there’s no attorney fee if the claim is lost.
There’s a major SSDI awareness gap among working Americans: Almost half of those who likely pay for it have never heard of it, and a large share aren’t aware that they carry anything like it.
We screened for work history first, before asking anything about disability.** Then we asked whether they'd have income replacement if an illness or injury kept them from working for a year or more. Nearly half said ‘No’ and almost six in ten either said ‘No’ or they weren’t sure.
When asked what coverage they actually have that would replace part of their income if an illness or injury left them unable to work for a year or more, nearly two in five (39.0%) said none. In fact, many respondents would likely be covered by the federal program if they became disabled based on the work history they reported. Workers' compensation and the federal program were named at almost identical rates (15.8% and 15.3%), even though workers' comp pays only when the job caused the condition and SSDI carries no such requirement. Notably, only 18 respondents named both.
Name recognition tells the same story. Asked which programs they'd heard of, even just the name, 51.7% recognized "Social Security Disability Insurance." Medicaid (72.1%) and Medicare (65.3%) are both more widely recognized. Workers' compensation drew roughly the same recognition as SSDI (53.9% versus 51.7%).
Nearly half of respondents (47.2%) sit on the bottom two rungs of the awareness ladder: 25.9% know disability benefits exist but have never looked into them, and 21.3% had never thought about them at all before taking this survey. Only 12.0% have ever gone looking for information. (The question only allowed one response, so there is no overlap among the bottom three responses.)
One result of the lack of awareness of SSDI benefits and the process of claiming them is that a large share of eligible adults likely do not access the program. Only 49% of workers who may qualify claim SSDI benefits according to Atticus estimates of the total eligible population, based on publicly available data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Social Security Administration.***
Beyond simple awareness there is confusion about the program’s requirements. Very few workers are able to answer the criteria for claiming this benefit that they are paying for each paycheck.
We listed ten possible requirements. Three are real. Seven are not.
The two most-cited requirements are both false, and they're false in opposite directions. Citizenship isn't required – lawfully present non-citizens with sufficient work credits qualify. This includes Green Card holders and some workers on temporary visas. Moreover, SSDI doesn't require permanent, lifelong disability; the standard is a condition that has lasted, or is expected to last, a continuous 12 months – or that can result in death.
The three actual program requirements were each named by only a third of respondents or fewer. The requirement that a disability has prevented a worker from doing their job for at least a year – which often decides whether a claim is worth filing – came in second-to-last at 19.2%.
Two misconceptions point at other programs entirely: 19.9% believe SSDI has an asset and income test, which describes Supplemental Security Income (SSI), not SSDI. 20.0% believe you have to have been injured on the job, which describes workers' compensation. Meanwhile 18.1% believe SSDI is something you opt into through an employer, which describes private disability insurance.
The monthly payment is well understood. Medicare is not. SSDI beneficiaries are automatically enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B after 24 months of entitlement. For a worker who has lost employer coverage along with their job, that is often worth more than the check. Yet a large majority (61.0%) didn't know it was part of the program.
The SNAP question is less obvious. (SNAP is the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, often called “food stamps.”) SSDI receipt doesn't enroll anyone in SNAP, but it does make a household "disabled" for SNAP purposes, which waives the gross income test, raises the asset limit to $4,500, and allows medical and uncapped shelter deductions. Respondents who selected it weren't wrong so much as imprecise.
In addition to lack of awareness about the program, a majority of workers either have no clue how much they pay for the coverage or overestimate how much they pay.
When asked what share of a typical full-time worker's pay goes toward SSDI, nearly one-third (31.8%) didn’t know, and another quarter (24.1%) thought it was more than 2%. At the other extreme, 7.4% said they contribute nothing at all. For a benefit funded by the person who might one day claim it, roughly two in five workers either think it's free or have no idea.
The employee's own withholding for the disability portion of Social Security is 0.9%. Counting the employer's matching share, the total contribution made on a worker's behalf is 1.8%. So 11.3% picked the figure matching their own paycheck, and another 25.5% picked a band containing the combined rate.*^
Not only do workers lack awareness of the program and how much they pay for it, they also lack understanding about the costs of getting help.
Disability representation typically works on contingency. There is nothing to pay upfront, and if the claim is denied, there is typically no attorney fee. In 2026, attorney fees are capped at 25% of past-due benefits or $9,200, whichever is less, and SSA has to approve them. Nearly half (46.9%) believe they'd face an upfront or hourly bill, and 45.0% believe a loss would still cost them a fee (roughly evenly split between a reduced fee and a full fee).
This is the misconception with the most direct consequences. A person weighing whether to get help is making this call based on a price that doesn't exist.
They do, at least, know the process doesn't end at a denial: 62.4% correctly said a rejected claim can be appealed through several stages, and they have a broadly accurate picture of what a lawyer does, though only about half identified each function: dealing with SSA about claim status (56.7%), representing the claimant at a hearing (55.2%), filing the application (52.7%), and gathering medical records (52.1%). One in four (24.7%) incorrectly believed a lawyer can speed up the government's decision, and 17.6% incorrectly believed a lawyer can increase the monthly benefit amount. (Monthly benefit amounts are set by formula from a worker's earnings record, and cannot be argued upward.)
Respondents are broadly sympathetic to people who apply for disability benefits. On net, they think applicants are honest, they think applicants earned the benefit, and they overwhelmingly think the system is too hard on the people who need it. But a (smaller) majority also thinks too many people get benefits who shouldn't.
The three statements sympathetic to applicants are the strongest results. More than three-quarters of respondents (77.1%) agree that the system is too hard on genuine claimants, and two-thirds (65.6%) agree that most applicants are probably telling the truth. A much narrower majority (54.6%) think that too many people get disability benefits who don’t really need them.
That is not as contradictory as it first reads. A respondent can believe every individual applicant is honest and still believe the program's boundaries are drawn too loosely. What the survey does show is that suspicion of the program does not translate into suspicion of the people in it. Sympathy for applicants is the stronger, more firmly held sentiment by a wide margin.
Polarized views are particularly prominent among older adults. Respondents aged 55+ had both the strongest opinions that “too many people get disability benefits who don’t really need them” and that “the system makes it too hard for people who genuinely need help.”
There is a major awareness gap among the SSDI-insured: The people who pay for it rarely know that they have it, or how to access it.
Few workers who contribute to the SSDI system are aware of the criteria to access it: that the work history they already have is what covers them, that citizenship is not required, that a disabling condition need not be permanent, that Medicare comes with the benefit, and that a lawyer costs nothing upfront and charges no fee unless the claim wins.
The most common misconceptions all point in the same direction: They make SSDI look narrower and more expensive to pursue than it is. For a program funded out of U.S. workers’ paychecks, this knowledge gap creates an unnecessary barrier for those who need it most.
Finally, there is complexity – the daunting task of claiming what they have paid for. More than three-quarters of people surveyed by Atticus think the social safety net is too byzantine for people who genuinely need help, and two-thirds think applicants are telling the truth. While many factors may play a role in any individual’s decision to apply, information is a significant initial barrier.
Atticus surveyed 1,033 US adults through SurveyMonkey Audience in August 2026. Respondents came from SurveyMonkey's opt-in online panel. Survey invitations were balanced to US Census Bureau figures for age, gender, region (the nine Census divisions) and household income.
Respondents were screened to be between 18 and 62 years old, to be US citizens or permanent residents, and to have a recent work history approximately consistent with SSDI insured status: respondents 25 and over were excluded if they had worked fewer than 2 of the past 10 years, and respondents 30 and over were excluded if they had worked fewer than 5. Anyone who had previously received government disability benefits was excluded, so this sample reflects people who have not been through the system.
The survey had 20 questions. They covered awareness of government benefit programs, understanding of SSDI eligibility, benefits and appeals, beliefs about disability lawyers and their fees, and attitudes toward the disability system.
For the full sample, the margin of error is ±3.0 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. Margins are wider for subgroups: about ±6.0 points for a group of 250 respondents. The sample came from an opt-in panel rather than a random sample, so this margin reflects sampling precision only. It doesn't account for other sources of error, such as who chose to take part or how questions were worded. Some totals may not add to 100% because of rounding or because some questions allowed more than one answer.
Atticus is a modern, public-interest law firm helping over 100,000 Americans each year claim Social Security Disability benefits. Founded in 2018, Atticus combines experienced lawyers and advocates with innovative technology, offering high-quality legal advice to help people claim the aid they deserve. In six years, Atticus has won over $8.5 billion in lifetime aid for clients.
Atticus is a licensed law firm, which means it can do what referral services legally can't: give real legal advice, make clear recommendations, and stay in a client's corner from the first call to the final decision. As such, Atticus is compensated under the same federally-regulated capped contingency-fee structure described in this report.
* Estimate based on a 0.9% tax allocation for the Disability Insurance Trust Fund, and median annual earnings of a full-time employed worker reported by the U.S. Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey Annual Socio-Economic Supplement, September 2025.
**82.5% of respondents reported working and paying taxes in at least 5 of the last 10 years; 57.6% reported working all ten.
***Atticus estimate. Calculated as the 7.2 million disabled workers receiving Social Security disability benefits as of December 2024, (SSA, Annual Statistical Report on the SSDI Program, 2024) divided by an estimated eligible population of approximately 14.5 million (US BLS , "Why did labor force nonparticipation increase from 1999 to 2022?", 2024). This estimate does not adjust for people who lack sufficient work credits to qualify, or for people who remain in the workforce despite a qualifying condition.
*^Total Social Security payroll taxes are 6.2% of wages from the employee, matched by another 6.2% from the employer, for a combined 12.4%. That 6.2% is split between two trust funds: 5.3% goes to Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (retirement and survivor benefits) and 0.9% goes to Disability Insurance. The disability portion is therefore 0.9% from the employee and 1.8% combined with the employer match. (SSA Office of the Chief Actuary, Social Security & Medicare Tax Rates)

Aaron Terrazas
Contributing Economist
For press inquiries, please email press@atticus.com.
At the bottom of many websites, you'll find a small disclaimer: "We are not a law firm and are not qualified to give legal advice." If you see this, run the other way. These people can't help you: they're prohibited by law from giving meaningful advice, recommending specific lawyers, or even telling you whether you need a lawyer at all.
There’s no disclaimer here: Atticus is a law firm, and we are qualified to give legal advice. We can answer your most pressing questions, make clear recommendations, and search far and wide to find the right lawyer for you.
Two important things to note: If we give you legal advice, it will be through a lawyer on our staff communicating with you directly. (Don't make important decisions about your case based solely on this or any other website.) And if we take you on as a client, it will be through a document you sign. (No attorney-client relationship arises from using this site or calling us.)
Terms | Privacy | California Privacy | CHD Policy | Disclaimer | This website is lawyer advertising.